Health A-Z Diaries Shopping
Tigerchild a parent's encyclopaedia
Under Fives Childhood Adolescence
 
Top Bar
Search
blank
Top Corners
    
Bottom Corners
blank
Browse By Topic
blank
Top Corners
  A-Z of Health Conditions  
  Babies and Under Fives  
  Childhood  
  Adolescence  
  Parenting  
  Education  
  Childcare  
  Sports & Leisure  
  Local Information  
  Health Issues  
blank blank blank
Bottom Corners
blank
Parenting Forums
blank
Top Corners
 
Visit the forums now
blank
  Our forums are here to help you share your thoughts and experiences with other parents.  
  >>visit the forums
blank
Bottom Corners
blank
BARGAIN BUY
blank
Top Corners
Bottom Corners
blank
IN THE NEWS ...
blank
Top Corners
>> MOBILE PHONE FEARS

Parents are ignoring health warnings by allowing young children to use mobile phones, according to a leading expert. In his latest report, Sir William Stewart, head of the National Radiological Protection Board, says there is still no proof that mobiles are harmful, but nonetheless he recommends a precautionary approach because of the difficulties of assessing the impact of such a rapidly evolving technology. He points out that childrens' skulls are not fully thickened and their nervous systems not properly developed - any radiation from a phone will penetrate further into their brains. Sir William also calls for a review of the planning process for base stations and argues that mobile phone masts should not be sited near schools, saying he is now more concerned about possible health hazards than he was five years ago. According to the latest figures, one in four children between the ages of seven and ten, now owns a mobile phone. 

Parents can help reduce the risks by chosing phones with a low emission rate or SAR - go to the Mobile Manufacturers Forum website for information on individual phones.

Do you think children under 8 should be allowed to use mobile phones? Tell us what you think by voting in our Tigerpoll.


Read Other Features
Bottom Corners
 
Bottom Bar
 
  PERFORMANCE TABLES  
 
>>back to last page
PERFORMANCE TABLES  

The tables

Other types of performance tables

How the tables are compiled

What the tables do tell you

Reading the performance tables

What they don’t tell you

Independent school performance tables

Ongoing debate

The Government introduced secondary school performance tables in 1992, followed by primary school league tables in 1996. They were introduced to improve school standards and enable parents to compare the academic success of schools with the others in their Local Education Authority (LEA) and the rest of the nation. Performance tables rank primary and secondary schools throughout England on the basis of their academic performance in English, Maths and Science at primary level and all subjects at GCSE level. Although this allows for comparisons of schools, the tables have also been criticised as an incomplete method of assessing school quality. Northern Ireland published performance tables up until 2000 and Wales has now abandoned tabling as well. In Scotland, performance tables are only compiled for secondary schools.

THE TABLES

England:

The school performance tables are compiled by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES), which publishes tables dating back to 1994 on its website.

Search tips:

  • ‘LEAs by region’ links you to comparative tables in which all the schools in a given LEA are listed against the national and LEA average for key stage results and year-on-year improvement.
  • The ‘background’ link at the top of the Performance Tables page provides enrolment statistics for each school in the LEA (including Special Needs students).
  • Secondary table results include absentee statistics.

Wales:

The National Assembly for Wales announced that it was abandoning tabling in July 2001. See the School Performance pages on the National Assembly for Wales site for information on exam results.

Scotland:

Scotland compiles performance tables for secondary schools. The Scottish examination results for 2003/04 are available online.

Northern Ireland:

After wide consultation with teachers, unions, schools and parents, the Northern Ireland Department for Education has decided to drop league tables in 2001. Schools will now publish their own results and achievements in prospectuses in a move intended to give parents a more rounded picture of each school.

HOW THE TABLES ARE COMPILED

The tables are compiled at the end of the academic year and are based on the results of the Key Stage tests, GCSEs, GNVQs and A-levels. Test results and background information are provided by the schools whilst GCSE, GNVQ and A-level results are supplied by the awarding bodies and checked by the schools. The DfES website explains the processes involved in the compilation of primary and secondary school tables.

All the league tables are published in November. More information about the examinations themselves is available in our Qualifications & Examinations section.

READING THE PERFORMANCE TABLES

When reading the results it is important to remember that the tables rank schools on the basis of narrowly defined statistical data - their examination results. It is useful to look at a school’s results over a number of years, to consider whether the numbers have remained consistent or have changed with time.

Primary Schools:

The DfES provides advice on how to read the information contained within the tables. It helps explain which pupils are included and how improvements are measured. It also offers a concise explanation of primary tables (as above).

Secondary Schools:

The DfES gives both a general introduction to the secondary school tables and a more in-depth understanding of the tables, e.g. which pupils are included, how the results are reported and how the points system and absence record works.

The DfES also publishes an explanatory list of abbreviations used in the performance tables

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL PERFORMANCE TABLES

Independent school results are included in the DfES performance tables, but if you would like to see direct comparisons between all independent schools, newspapers compile separate independent school league tables. When reading the results it is worth noting that there is nothing stopping newspapers supplementing the exam statistics with their own criteria, potentially altering the order in which schools may appear from newspaper to newspaper. Try these independent school league tables:

OTHER TYPES OF PERFORMANCE TABLES

Comparisons with similar schools, defined as being in the same benchmark group nationally (e.g. Special Educational Needs (SEN) schools, selective schools, schools with a higher number of pupils eligible for free school meals etc) are produced in Performance and Assessment Reports (PANDA) and Pre-Inspection and Context School Indicators (PICSI). They are not part of the public reporting of schools’ performance but some of the information they gather can appear in the parents’ summary of the inspection report produced by OFSTED. Both can be useful tools in interpreting the statistics produced by the league tables. For example, your local selective grammar school may seem to be doing well against the schools in its LEA but set against the national average of similar schools its results may actually be falling short.

Value-Added Results

Value-added considers schools' input into improving pupils’ performance between the Key Stages. From 1998 through to 2001 the government ran value-added pilot schemes between KS3 and GCSE/GNVQ and between KS2 and KS3, comparing pupil improvement levels and in 2002 it ran a value-added pilot scheme between KS1 and KS2. The Government has published data on the 2002 KS1 - KS2 Value Added Pilot, with information on how to interpret it. You can see the timetable for full implementation on the DfES site.

For another perspective on the tables, several media sources have divided the results by school type.

WHAT THE TABLES DO TELL YOU

The performance tables provide a sense of the academic state of a school. They rank each school on their basic exam statistics. This is a useful starting point from which to look at schools’ academic records. The tables also include some background information about each school. A major criticism often levelled at league tables is that they do not take all the variables, such as selective and non-selective schools, free school meals and so forth, into consideration. Advocates argue, however, that if they did the league tables would be too complicated to use as a comparative tool. As they stand, they do tell you if a school is improving year-on-year, highlight erratic results and reveal general trends. (See ongoing debate.)

WHAT THE TABLES DO NOT TELL YOU

League tables do not provide a specific comparison of similar bracketed schools inside or outside its LEA to help measure the comparative success of certain types of school. Value-added measures should help - these consider schools' input into improving pupil performance between Key Stages. Some schools may not have great exam results but have added more value to pupils’ individual improvement rates than other schools. At present such achievements are not reflected in all the tables, which merely rank schools by their raw results, but full publication of value-added data is expected by 2005 - see the timetable, learn more about value-added tables and see the top 5% of primary schools in England using the value-added measure.

They reveal nothing of the ethos of the school, nor for instance, the school’s standpoint on non-academic issues such as bullying and drugs. To objectively assess a school, parents would be wise to examine the school’s OFSTED reports, the School Governors’ annual reports and to visit the school in person. You can search for performance results and a school’s accompanying OFSTED Report at the DfES's parents' site. You’ll find more information in our School Inspections section.

Critics of the league table system feel that there is more to schools than just exams. Performance tables have been accused of creating divisions within the education system. By failing to explore a school in its entirety, they overlook any achievements outside the classroom and the less tangible qualities of a safe secure and positive environment in which to learn. (See ongoing debate.)

ONGOING DEBATE

A lot has been written in the press about performance tables and their strengths and weaknesses in assessing a school. Head teachers, politicians and parents have all voiced their opinions. For more information on the issues surrounding league tables keep in touch with these education sections in the media:



blank
>>back to last page
 
 
BACK TO SCHOOL - THE LOWDOWN
BULLYING
CHOOSING A STATE SCHOOL
CHOOSING AN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DYSLEXIA
EDUCATION FEATURE STORIES
EXAMINATIONS & QUALIFICATIONS
HOME EDUCATION
HOMEWORK
NATIONAL CURRICULUM
OUT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
PERFORMANCE TABLES
SCHOOL INSPECTIONS
SCHOOL SEARCH
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS
SPECIALIST SCHOOLS
 
 
Top Bar
Login / Register
Top Corners
 
Email
Password:
Remember Me.
Forgotten Password ?

Register
 
Bottom Corners
blank
THis Week in Health
Top Corners
 
Dr Catherine Gant discusses -

flu jabs for children, a medical view on the smacking debate, how to avoid food poisoning, childhood risk factors, the effects of radio masts, and more ....

blank
Bottom Corners
blank
This Weeks Poll
Top Corners
 
Your Vote Counts
blank
  Should children under 8 be allowed to use a mobile phone? blank
»  Yes
»  No
»  Only with a radiation shield
Bottom Corners
blank
Featured Diary
blank
Top Corners
 
>> WELCOME TO MY PLANET

Juliet Jones lives in domestic chaos with husband Steve, son Oliver (aged 5) and daughters Billie (aged 3) and Rosa (born 1 May 2003) in Hertfordshire.
blank
  Read this Diary
blank
Bottom Corners
 
Bottom Bar
Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Help | About | Data Protection | Disclaimer | Useful Links
Tigerchild a parent's encyclopaedia Sitemap 2 4